By Dennis Kucinich
Late Thursday night [December 11], the House of Representatives unanimously passed a far-reaching Russia sanctions bill, a hydra-headed incubator of poisonous conflict. The second provocative anti-Russian legislation in a week, it further polarizes our relations with Russia, helping to cement a Russia-China alliance against Western hegemony, and undermines long-term Americaâ€™s financial and physical security by handing the national treasury over to war profiteers.
Hereâ€™s how the Houseâ€™s touted â€œunanimityâ€ was achieved: Under a parliamentary motion termed â€œunanimous consent,â€ legislative rules can be suspended and any bill can be called up. If any member of Congress objects, the motion is blocked and the bill dies.
At 10:23:54 p.m. on Thursday, a member rose to ask â€œunanimous consentâ€ for four committees to be relieved of a Russia sanctions bill. At this point the motion, and the legislation, could have been blocked by a single member who would say â€œI object.â€Â No one objected, because no one was watching for last-minute bills to be slipped through.
Most of the House and the media had emptied out of the chambers after passage of the $1.1 trillion government spending package.
The Congressional Record will show only three of 425 members were present on the floor to consider the sanctions bill. Two of the three feigned objection, creating the legislative equivalent of a â€˜time out.â€™ They entered a few words of support, withdrew their â€œobjectionsâ€ and the clock resumed.
According to the clerkâ€™s records, once the bill was considered under unanimous consent, it was passed, at 10:23:55 p.m., without objection, in one recorded, time-stamped second, unanimously.
Then the House adjourned.
I discovered, in my 16 years in Congress, that many members seldom read the legislation on which they vote. On Oct. 24, 2001, House committees spent long hours debating the Patriot Act. At the last minute, the old bill was swapped out for a version with draconian provisions. I voted against that version of the Patriot Act, because I read it. The legislative process requires attention.
Legislation brought before Congress under â€œunanimous consentâ€ is not read by most members simply because copies of the bill are generally not available. During the closing sessions of Congress I would often camp out in the House chamber, near the clerkâ€™s desk, prepared to say â€œI objectâ€ when something of consequence appeared out of the blue. Dec. 11, 2014, is one of the few times I regret not being in Congress to have the ability to oversee the process.
The Russia Sanctions bill that passed â€œunanimously,â€ with no scheduled debate, at 10:23:55 p.m. on Dec. 11, 2014, includes:
- Sanctions of Russiaâ€™s energy industry, including Rosoboronexport and Gazprom.
- Sanctions of Russiaâ€™s defense industry, with respect to arms sales to Syria.
- Broad sanctions on Russiansâ€™ banking and investments.
- Provisions for privatization of Ukrainian infrastructure, electricity, oil, gas and renewables, with the help of the World Bank and USAID.
- Fifty million dollars to assist in a corporate takeover of Ukraineâ€™s oil and gas sectors.
- Three hundred and fifty million dollars for military assistance to Ukraine, includingÂ anti-tank, anti-armor, optical, and guidance and control equipment, as well as drones.
- Thirty million dollars for an intensive radio, television and Internet propagandaÂ campaign throughout the countries of the former Soviet Union.
- Twenty million dollars for â€œdemocratic organizingâ€ in Ukraine.
- Sixty million dollars, spent through groups like the National Endowment for Democracy, â€œto improve democratic governance, and transparency, accountability [and] rule of lawâ€ in Russia. What brilliant hyperbole to pass such a provision the same week the Senateâ€™s CIA torture report was released.
- An unverified declaration that Russia has violated the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, is a nuclear â€œthreat to the United Statesâ€ and should be held â€œaccountable.â€
- A path for the U.S. withdrawal from the INF Treaty, which went into force in 1988. The implications of this are immense. An entire series of arms agreements are at risk of unraveling. It may not be long before NATO pushes its newest client state, Ukraine, to abrogate the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which Ukraine signed when it gave up its nuclear weapons, and establish a renewed nuclear missile capability, 300 miles from Moscow.
- A demand that Russia verifiably dismantle â€œany ground launched cruise missiles or ballistic missiles with a range of between 500 and 5,500 kilometers …â€â€”i.e., 300 and 3,300 miles.
Read the legislation, which Congress apparently didnâ€™t.
As reported on GlobalSecurity.org, earlier that same day in Kiev, the Ukrainian parliament approved a security plan that will:
- Declare that Ukraine should become a â€œmilitary state.â€
- Reallocate more of its approved 2014 budget for military purposes.
- Put all military operating units on alert.
- Mobilize military and national guard units.
- Increase military spending in Ukraine from 1 percent of GDP to 5 percent, increasing military spending by $3 billion over the next few years.
- Join NATO and switch to NATO military standards.
Under the guise of democratizing, the West stripped Ukraine of its sovereignty with a U.S.-backed coup, employed it as a foil to advance NATO to the Russian border and reignited the Cold War, complete with another nuclear showdown.
The people of Ukraine will be less free, as their country becomes a â€œmilitary state,â€ goes into hock to international banks, faces structural readjustments, privatization of its public assets, decline of social services, higher prices and an even more severe decline in its standard of living.
In its dealings with the European Union, Ukraine could not even get concessions for its citizens to find work throughout Europe. The West does not care about Ukraine, or its people, except for using them to seize a strategic advantage against Russia in the geopolitical game of nations.
Once, with the help of the West, Ukraine fully weighs in as a â€œmilitary stateâ€ and joins the NATO gun club, its annual defense budget will be around $3 billion, compared with the current defense budget of Russia, which is over $70 billion.
Each Western incitement creates a Russian response, which is then given as further proof that the West must prepare for the very conflict it has created, war as a self-fulfilling prophecy.
That the recent Russia sanctions bill was advanced, â€œunanimously,â€ without debate in the House, portends that our nation is sleepwalking through the graveyards of history, toward an abyss where controlling factors reside in the realm of chance, what Thomas Hardy termed â€œcrass casualty.â€ Such are the perils of unanimity.Î¦
Dennis Kucinich is a former U.S. Representative from Ohio, serving from 1997 to 2013. He was also a candidate for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States in the 2004 and 2008 Presidential elections. He was a member of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. From 1977 to 1979, Kucinich served as the 53rd Mayor of Cleveland, Ohio.