DAVID ROBERTS – I know lots of websites (including Grist!) allow â€œguest bloggersâ€ to repost stuff. But I think of The Christian Science Monitor as something of an institution. Itâ€™s disappointing to find misleading dreck on its site. Do I have to squint at the small print before I can trust an article on CSM now? Is there no editing? You kids get off my lawn!
ERIN NIEMELA – About a week ago I had the unfortunate experience of being followed off a bus on a dark corner. The man who followed me made it clear that he intended harm â€“ even growling at me as I hastened into a nearby open market. The experience was benign compared to many others Iâ€™ve had, but it compelled me to revisit my understanding of and beliefs in feminism.
PETER J. HENNINGS – The criminal investigation was prompted by a referral from the Senateâ€™s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, based on its 635-page report on the financial crisis that included details on Goldmanâ€™s transactions in mortgage-backed securities. The report highlighted potential conflicts of interest in how Goldman dealt with its clients and questioned whether Mr. Blankfein testified truthfully at an April 2010 subcommittee hearing when he said that the firm did not have a â€œmassive shortâ€ position to bet on a decline the housing market.