By William R. Polk
[Editor’s Note: As this article explains, underlying the political situation in Syria is an economic and ecological disaster resulting from climate change. As more and more people competed for scarce jobs, food and other resources, they became desperate and their desperation led inexorably to war. Military support for neither side of the conflict will address its root causes. This piece is excerpted from a longer article which can be read at http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/09/your-labor-day-syria-reader-part-2-william-polk/279255/.]
Syria has been convulsed by civil war since climate change came to Syria with a vengeance. Drought devastated the country from 2006 to 2011. Rainfall in most of the country fell below eight inches (20 cm) a year, the absolute minimum needed to sustain un-irrigated farming.Â Desperate for water, farmers began to tap aquifers with tens of thousands of new well. But, as they did, the water table quickly dropped to a level below which their pumps could lift it.
[USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Commodity Intelligence Report, May 9, 2008]
In some areas, all agriculture ceased. In others crop failures reached 75%. And generally as much as 85% of livestock died of thirst or hunger. Hundreds of thousandsÂ Â of Syriaâ€™s farmers gave up, abandoned their farms and fled to the cities and towns in search of almost non-existent jobs and severely short food supplies. Outside observers including UN experts estimated that between 2 and 3Â Â million of Syriaâ€™s 10 million rural inhabitants were reduced to â€œextreme poverty.â€
Survival Mode Amidst Environmental, Economic and Social Upheaval
The domestic Syrian refugees immediately found that they had to compete not only with one another for scarce food, water and jobs, but also with the already existing foreign refugee population. Syria already was a refuge for quarter of a million Palestinians and about a hundred thousand people who had fled the war and occupation of Iraq. Formerly prosperous farmers were lucky to get jobs as hawkers or street sweepers. And in the desperation of the times, hostilities erupted among groups that were competing just to survive.
Survival was the key issue. The senior UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) representative in Syria turned to the USAID program for help. Terming the situation â€œa perfect storm,â€ in November 2008, he warned that Syria faced â€œsocial destruction.â€ He noted that the Syrian Minister of Agriculture had â€œstated publicly that [the]Â Â economic and social fallout from the drought was â€˜beyond our capacity as a country to deal with.â€™â€ But, his appeal fell on deaf ears: the USAID director commented that â€œwe question whether limited [U.S. Government] resources should be directed toward this appeal at this timeâ€ (reported on November 26, 2008 in cable 08DAMASCUS847_a to Washington and â€œleakedâ€ to Wikileaks ).
Whether or not this was a wise decision, we now know that the Syrian government made the situation much worse by its next action.Â Lured by the high price of wheat on the world market, it sold its reserves. In 2006, according to the US Department of Agriculture, it sold 1,500,000 metric tons or twice as much as in the previous year. The next year it had little left to export; in 2008 and for the rest of the drought years it had to import enough wheat to keep its citizens alive.
So tens of thousands of frightened, angry, hungry and impoverished former farmers . . . constituted a â€œtinderâ€ that was ready to catch fire. The spark was struck on March 15, 2011Â Â when a relatively small group gathered in the town of Daraa to protest against government failure to help them. Instead of meeting with the protestors and at least hearing their complaints, the government cracked down on them as subversives. The Assads, who had ruled the country since 1971, were not known for political openness or popular sensitivity. And their action backfired. Riots broke out all over the country.Â As they did,Â the Assads attempted to quell them with military force. They failed to do so and, as outside help â€“ money from the Gulf states and Muslim â€œfreedom fightersâ€ from the rest of the world â€“ poured into the country, the government lost control over 30% of the countryâ€™s rural areas and perhaps half of its population. By the spring of 2013, according to the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR), upwards of 100,000 people had been killed in the fighting, perhaps 2 million have lost their homes and upwards of 2 million have fled abroad. Additionally, vast amounts of infrastructure, virtually whole cities like Aleppo, have been destroyed.
Despite these tragic losses, the war is now thought to be stalemated: the government cannot be destroyed and the rebels cannot be defeated. The reasons are not only military: they are partlyÂ economic– there is little to which the rebels could return;Â Â partlyÂ politicalÂ â€“ the government has managed to retain the loyalty of a large part of the majority Muslim community which comprises the bulk of its army and civil service whereas the rebels, as I have mentioned, are fractured into many mutually hostile groups;Â Â and partlyÂ administrativeÂ Â — by and large the governmentâ€™sÂ Â structure has held together and functions satisfactorily whereas the rebels have no single government.Î¦
In President John F. Kennedy’s administration, William R. Polk was the member of the Policy Planning Council responsible for much of the Islamic world, including Afghanistan. He later became professor of history at the University of Chicago and president of the Adlai Stevenson Institute of International Affairs. He is the author of 17 books including Understanding Iraq, Violent Politics and Understanding Iran. He is now at work on a book on Afghanistan to be entitled The Cockpit of Asia. His website is www.williampolk.com.
1 comment for “The Real Culprit in Syria: Climate Change”