By Norman Solomon
Ever since the first big revelations about the National Security Agency five months ago, Dianne Feinstein has been in overdrive to defend the surveillance state. As chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, she generates an abundance of fog, weasel words, anti-whistleblower slander and bogus notions of reform — while methodically stabbing civil liberties in the back.
Feinsteinâ€™s powerful service to Big Brother, reaching new heights in recent months, is just getting started. Sheâ€™s hard at work to muddy all the waters of public discourse she can — striving to protect the NSA from real legislative remedies while serving as a key political enabler for President Obamaâ€™s shameless abuse of the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments.
Paging Mr. Orwell
Last Sunday, on CBS, when FeinsteinÂ toldÂ â€œFace the Nationâ€ viewers that Edward Snowden has done â€œenormous disservice to our country,â€ it was one of her more restrained smears. In June, when Snowden first went public as a whistleblower, Feinstein quicklyÂ declaredÂ that he had committed â€œan act of treason.â€ Since then, she has refused to tone down the claim. â€œI stand by it,â€ sheÂ toldÂ The HillÂ on Oct. 29.
Days ago, taking it from the top of the NSAâ€™s mainÂ talking points, Feinstein led off aÂ San Francisco ChronicleÂ op-ed pieceÂ with 9/11 fear-mongering. â€œThe Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the United States was highly organized and sophisticated and designed to strike at the heart of the American economy and government,â€ she wrote, and quickly added: â€œWe know that terrorists remain determined to kill Americans and our allies.â€
From there, Senator Feinstein praised the NSAâ€™s â€œcall-records programâ€ and then insisted: â€œThis is not a surveillance program.â€Â (Paging Mr. Orwell.)
Feinsteinâ€™s essay — touting her newÂ bill, the â€œFISA Improvements Act,â€ which she just pushed through the Senate Intelligence Committee — claimed that the legislation will â€œbridge the gap between preventing terrorism and protecting civil liberties.â€ But as Electronic Frontier Foundation activist Trevor TimmÂ writes, the bill actually â€œcodifies some of the NSAâ€™s worst practices, would be a huge setback for everyoneâ€™s privacy, and it would permanently entrench the NSAâ€™s collection of every phone record held by U.S. telecoms.â€
Californiaâ€™s senior senator is good at tactical maneuvers that blow media smoke. In late October — while continuing to defend the NSAâ€™s planetary dragnet on emails and phone calls — FeinsteinÂ voiced concernÂ â€œthat certain surveillance activities have been in effect for more than a decade and that the Senate Intelligence Committee wasnâ€™t satisfactorily informed.â€ Spinning the myth that congressional oversight of the NSA really exists, she added: â€œTherefore, our oversight needs to be strengthened and increased.â€
In Sync with Obama White House
As usual, Feinsteinâ€™s verbal gymnastics were in sync with choreography from the Obama White House. The â€œcertain surveillance activitiesâ€ that she has begun to criticize are the NSAâ€™s efforts targeting the phones of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and other allied foreign leaders. Feinstein mildly chided Obama for ostensibly not being aware of the eavesdropping on Merkelâ€™s cell phone (â€œThat is a big problemâ€), but she was merely snipping at a few threads of the NSAâ€™s vast global spying — while, like the administration as a whole, reaffirming support for the vast fabric of the agencyâ€™s surveillance programs.
The White House is now signaling policy changes in response to the uproar about monitoring Merkelâ€™s phone, theÂ New York TimesÂ reported on Nov. 5, but â€œPresident ObamaÂ and his top advisers have concluded that there is no workable alternative to the bulk collection of huge quantities of â€˜metadata,â€™ including records of all telephone calls made inside the United States.â€ Feinstein is on the same page: eager to fine tune and continue mass surveillance.
With fanfare that foreshadows a drawn-out onslaught of hype, Feinstein has announced that the Senate Intelligence Committee will hold hearings on NSA surveillance. â€œHer committee is now making preparations for a major investigative undertaking, which is expected to take at least several months,â€ theÂ Wall Street JournalÂ reports. When the show is over, â€œThe report that results from the probe will be classified.â€
With Dianne Feinsteinâ€™s hand on the gavel, you can expect plenty of fake inquiries to pantomime actual oversight. She has shown a clear commitment to deep-sixing vital information about the surveillance state, in a never-ending quest for theÂ uninformed consent of the governed. â€œFrom out of the gate, we know that her entire approach is to make those hearings into a tragic farce,â€ I said during anÂ interviewÂ on C-SPAN Radio last week. â€œHer entire approach to this issue has been to do damage control for the NSAâ€¦. She is an apologist and a flack for the surveillance state, she is aligned with the Obama White House with that agenda, and we at the grassroots must push back against that kind of a politics.â€Î¦
Norman Solomon is co-founder of RootsAction.org and founding director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His books include War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death. Information about the documentary based on the book is atÂ www.WarMadeEasyTheMovie.org.