By Darius Shahtahmasebi
August 04, 2016 “Information Clearing House” – “Anti Media” – Corporate media regularly attempts to present Bashar al-Assadâ€™s government in Syria as solely responsible for the ongoing conflict in the region. The media does report on events that contradict this narrative â€” albeit sparingly â€” but taken together, these underreported details shine a new light on the conflict.
10: Bashar al-Assad has a higher approval rating than Barack Obama.
Despite Obamaâ€™s claims Assad is illegitimate and must step down, the fact remains that since the conflict erupted in 2011,Â Assad has held the majority support of his people. The elections in 2014 â€“Â which Assad won by a landslide with international observers claiming no violations â€“ is a testament to the fact that although Assad has been accused of serious human rights violations, he continues to remain reasonably popular with the Syrian people.
Obama, on the other hand, won elections in 2012 with a voter turnout ofÂ a mere 53.6 percentÂ of the American public; only 129.1 million total were votes cast. This means approximatelyÂ 189.8 million American people did not vote for Obama. His current approval rating sits at aboutÂ 50 percent.
9:Â The â€œmoderateâ€ opposition has been hijacked.
There is no longer such a thing as â€œmoderateâ€ opposition in Syria â€“ if there ever was. The so-called Western-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA)Â has been dominated by extremists for years. The U.S. has known this yet has continued to support the Syrian opposition, despite the fact the New York TimesÂ reported in 2012 that the majority of weapons being sent to Syria have been ending up in the hands of jihadists. AÂ classified DIA reportÂ predicted the rise of ISIS in 2012, stating:
â€œIf the situation unravels, there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in eastern Syriaâ€¦ and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime.â€
Further, an FSA commanderÂ went on record not only to admit his fighters regularly conduct joint operations with al-Nusra (al-Qaeda in Syria), but also that he would like to see Syria ruled by Sharia law.
Apparently, moderate can also mean â€œal-Qaeda affiliated fanatic.â€
8:Â Assad never used chemical weapons on his own people.
A U.N. investigation into the first major chemical weapons attack committed in early 2013 â€” an atrocity the West immediately pinned on Assad â€” concluded the evidence suggested the attack was more likely committed by the Syrian opposition. A subsequent U.N. investigation into the August 2013 attackÂ never laid blame on anyone, including Assadâ€™s forces. In December 2013, Pulitzer prize-winning journalist Seymour HershÂ released an article highlighting deficiencies in the way the situation was handled:
â€œIn the months before the attack, the American intelligence agencies produced a series of highly classified reportsâ€¦citing evidence that the al-Nusra Front, a jihadi group affiliated with al-Qaida, had mastered the mechanics of creating sarin and was capable of manufacturing it in quantity. When the attack occurred al-Nusra should have been a suspect, but the administration cherry-picked intelligence to justify a strike against Assad.â€
7: Toppling the Syrian regime was part of a plan adopted shortly after 9/11.
According to a memo disclosed byÂ 4-star General Wesley Clark, shortly after 9/11, the Pentagon adopted a plan to topple the governments of seven countries within five years. The countries were Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Iran. [Click here to view a 2007 youtube video of an interview on Democracy Now in which General Clark discusses learning about these developments. And click here to hear a 2007 talk at the Commonwealth Club of California by General Clark in which he recounts learning about this idea of toppling governments as early as 1991.]
As we know, Iraq was invaded in 2003. American ally Israel tried its hand at taking out Lebanon in 2006. Libya was destroyed in 2011. Prior to this intervention, Libya had the highest standard of living of any country in Africa. In 2015, alone, it dropped 27 places on the U.N. Human Development Index rating. U.S. drones fly over Somalia, U.S. troops areÂ stationed in South Sudan â€” Sudan was partitioned following a brutal civil war â€” and Syria has been the scene of a deadly war since 2011. This leaves only Iran, which is discussed below.
6:Â Iran and Syria have a mutual defense agreement.
Since 2005, Iran and Syria have been bound by aÂ mutual defense agreement. The Iranian government has shown they intend to fully honor this agreement and has provided the Syrian regime with all manner of support, including troops, aÂ $1 billion credit line, training, and advisement. What makes this conflict even more dangerous, however, is the fact Russia andÂ China have sided with Iran and Syria, stating openly they will not tolerate any attack on Iran. Russiaâ€™s military intervention in Syria in recent months proves these are not idle threats â€“ they have put their money where their mouth is.
Iran has been in the crosshairs of the U.S. foreign policy establishment forÂ some time now. George W. Bush failed to generate the support needed to attack Iran during his time in office â€” though not for lack of trying â€” andÂ since 2012, sanctions have been the go-to mantra. By attacking and destabilizing Iranâ€™s most important ally in the region, the powers that be can undermine Iranian attempts to spread its influence in the region, ultimately further weakening Iran.
5:Â Former Apple CEO is the son of a Syrian refugee.
The lateÂ Steve Jobs, founder of Apple, was the son of a Syrian who moved to the United States in the 1950s. This is particularly amusing given the amount of xenophobia, Islamophobia, racism and hatred refugees and migrants seem to have inspired â€” even from aspiring presidents. Will a President Donald Trump create the conditions in which future technological pioneers may never reach the United States? His rhetoric seems to indicate as much.
4:Â ISIS arose out of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, not the Syrian conflict.
ISIS was formerly known as al-Qaeda in Iraq, which rose to prominence following the U.S.-U.K. led invasion of Iraq in 2003. It is well-known that there was no tangible al-Qaeda presence in Iraq until after the invasion, and there is a reason for this. When Paul Bremer was given the role of Presidential Envoy to Iraq in May 2003, heÂ dissolved the police and military. Bremer fired close to 400,000 former servicemen, including high-ranking military officials who fought in the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s. These generals now hold senior ranking positions within ISIS. If it werenâ€™t for the United Statesâ€™ actions, ISIS likely wouldnâ€™t exist.
ISIS was previously known by the U.S. security establishment as al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), but these fighters ultimately became central to Western regime change agendas in Libya and Syria. When the various Iraqi and Syrian al-Qaeda-affiliated groups merged on the Syrian border in 2014, we were left with the fully-fledged terror group we face today.
3: Turkey, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia wanted to build a pipeline through Syria, but Assad rejected it.
In 2009,Â Qatar proposed a pipeline to run through Syria and Turkey to export Saudi gas. Assad rejected the proposal and instead formed an agreement with Iran and Iraq to construct a pipeline to the European market that would cut Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar out of the route entirely. Since, Turkey, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia have beenÂ staunch backersÂ of the opposition seeking to topple Assad. Collectively, they have invested billions of dollars, lent weapons, encouraged the spread of fanatical ideology, and helped smuggle fighters across their borders.
The Iran-Iraq pipeline will strengthen Iranian influence in the region and undermine their rival, Saudi Arabia â€” the other main OPEC producer. Given the ability to transport gas to Europe without going through Washingtonâ€™s allies, Iran will hold the upper-hand and will be able to negotiate agreements that exclude the U.S. dollar completely.
2:Â Leaked phone calls show Turkey provides ISIS fighters with expensive medical care.
Turkeyâ€™s support for hardline Islamists fighting the Syrian regime isÂ extensive. In fact, jihadists regularly refer to the Turkish border as the â€œgateway to Jihad.â€ In May 2016,Â reports started emerging of Turkey going so far as to provide ISIS fighters with expensive medical treatment.
Turkey is a member of NATO. Let that sink in for a moment.
1:Â Western mediaâ€™s main source for the conflict is a T-shirt shop in Coventry, England.
This is not a joke. If you follow the news, you most probably have heard the mainstream media quote an entity grandiosely called the â€œSyrian Observatory for Human Rightsâ€ (SOHR). This so-called â€œobservatoryâ€ is run by one man in his home in Coventry, England â€” thousands of miles away from the Syrian conflict â€” yet is quoted by most respected Western media outlets (BBC, Reuters, The Guardian, and International Business Times, for example). His credentials include his ownership of a T-shirt shop just down the road, as well as being a notorious dissident against the current Syrian president.
Despite the fact much of the information in this article comes from mainstream outlets, those circulating it refuse to put all of the storylines together to give the public an accurate picture of what is going on in Syria.
Assad may be brutal â€” and should face trial for allegations of widespread human rights abuses â€” but this fact alone does not make the other circumstances untrue or irrelevant. People have the right to be properly informed before they allow themselves to be led down the road of more war in the Middle East, and consequently, more terror attacks and potential conflicts with Russia and China.Î¦
Darius Shahtahmasebi has written articles for Truthout, Anti-Media and other publications.