Thursday, March 8, 2018. WASHINGTON, D.C. â€“ Amid heightened tension with Russia, U.S. SenatorsÂ Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) today urged Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to begin a new round of strategic talks with Russia without delay.
â€œA U.S.-Russia Strategic Dialogue is more urgent following President Putinâ€™s public address on March 1st when he referred to several new nuclear weapons Russia is reportedly developing including a cruise missile and a nuclear underwater drone, which are not currently limited by the New START treaty, and would be destabilizing if deployed,â€ the Senators wrote. â€œThere is no doubt we have significant disagreements with Russia,Â including Russiaâ€™s brazen interference in the 2016 U.S. elections;Â continued violation of the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF); invasion of Ukraine and illegal annexation of Crimea; and destabilizing actions in Syria.
â€œHowever, it is due to these policy rifts, not in spite of them, that the United States should urgently engage with Russia to avoid miscalculation and reduce the likelihood of conflict,â€ the Senators continued.
In their letter to Tillerson, the Senators urged the administration to address Russiaâ€™s violation of the INF; to extend the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, commonly known as New START; and to work to enhance transparency on non-nuclear weapons. All of these steps are intended to lessen the chance that nuclear weapons will ever be used again.
The full text of the letter follows below.
March 08, 2018
The Honorable Rex W. Tillerson
Secretary of State
U. S. Department of State
Dear Secretary Tillerson:
We write to urge the State Department to convene the next U.S.-Russia Strategic Dialogue as soon as possible.
A U.S.-Russia Strategic Dialogue is more urgent following President Putinâ€™s public address on March 1st when he referred to several new nuclear weapons Russia is reportedly developing including a cruise missile and a nuclear underwater drone, which are not currently limited by the New START treaty, and would be destabilizing if deployed.Â Â Â There is no doubt we have significant disagreements with Russia, including Russiaâ€™s brazen interference in the 2016 U.S. elections; continued violation of the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF); invasion of Ukraine and illegal annexation of Crimea; and destabilizing actions in Syria.Â Â However, it is due to theseÂ policy rifts, not in spite of them, that the United States should urgently engage with Russia to avoid miscalculation and reduce the likelihood of conflict.
First, we encourage the administration to propose alternative solutions to address Russiaâ€™s violation of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF).Â Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov admitted to the existence of this ground launched cruise missile (GLCM), but contended that the system was INF Treaty compliant.
Senior officials from the United States and Russia have said that the INF Treaty plays an â€œimportant role in the existing system of international security.â€Â As such, we urge the State Department to resolve Russiaâ€™s violation through existing INF Treaty provisions or new mutually acceptable means.
Second, we urge the United States to extend the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START).Â The Trump administrationâ€™s own 2018 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) references Russiaâ€™s robust nuclear modernization program as a main justification behind the U.S. need to recapitalize its three legs of the nuclear triad.Â An extension of New START would verifiably lock-in the Treatyâ€™s Central Limits â€“ and with it â€“ the reductions in strategic forces Russia has made.
The New START Treaty, which entered into force in 2011, provides transparency and predictability into the size and location of Russiaâ€™s strategic nuclear delivery systems, warheads, and facilities.Â New STARTâ€™s robust verification architecture involves thousands of data exchanges and regular on-site inspections. The United States confirmed in February that Russia met New STARTâ€™s Central Treaty Limits and it stated that â€œimplementation of the New START Treaty enhances the safety and security of the United States.â€Â These same Central Treaty Limits could also govern two of the new types of nuclear weapons referenced by President Putin on March 1stÂ â€“ a case the United States can argue through the Treatyâ€™s Biannual Consultative Commission (BCC).
Lastly, as the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review notes, Russia maintains a numerical advantage to the United States in the number of non-strategic nuclear weapons. The Senate, in its Resolution of Ratification on New START in 2010, took stock of this imbalance and called upon the United States to commence negotiations that would â€œsecure and reduce tactical nuclear weapons in a verifiable manner.â€ Attempts by the Obama administration to negotiate an agreement on this class of weapons met resistance from Russia.Â However, even absent the political space for a formal agreement or binding treaty with Russia, we urge the State Department to discuss ways to enhance transparency on non-strategic nuclear weapons.
Extending New START, resolving Russiaâ€™s INF violation, and enhancing transparency measures relating to non-strategic nuclear weapons will also help quiet growing calls from many countries that the United States is not upholding its Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) obligations.Â The Treatyâ€™s three mutually reinforcing pillars: non-proliferation, peaceful uses of the atom, and disarmament can only be advanced through U.S. leadership on all three.
There is no guarantee that we can make progress with Russia on these issues.Â However, even at the height of Cold War tensions, the United States and the Soviet Union were able to engage on matters of strategic stability.Â Leaders from both countries believed, as we should today, that the incredible destructive force of nuclear weapons is reason enough to make any and all efforts to lessen the chance that they can never be used again.
Sincerely . . .
The Washington Post is an American daily newspaper. Published in Washington, D.C., it was founded on December 6, 1877. Located as it is in the capital city of the United States, the newspaper has a particular emphasis on national politics. The newspaper’s slogan states, “Democracy dies in darkness.” Daily editions are printed for the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia. It is published as a broadsheet.