By Patrick T. Hiller
â€œIt was the wrong speech, at the wrong time, to the wrong audience,â€ Swedish foreign Minister Margot WallstrÃ¶m expressed about what global and U.S. audiences helplessly had to endure during President Donald Trumpâ€™s September 19, 2017 address to the United Nations General Assembly. President Trump acted like a bully, but unaware that he showed up at the wrong playground.
The United Nations was founded after World War II â€œto save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankindâ€¦â€. There is no doubt that the United Nations has never fully reached its potential, and without fundamental reform it never will. The spirit, however, is laid out clearly in the UN Charter. While being center stage at the United Nations General Assembly, an assembly where global collaboration is emphasized, Trump bragged about the United States, fueled division, and threatened other nations. The threat to â€œtotally destroy North Koreaâ€ is beyond any form of acceptability, regardless if it is rhetorical or real. It is therefore important to challenge Trumpâ€™s own words. We must not forget that he is the Commander-in-Chief with the authority to launch nuclear weapons.
Trump: â€œRogue regimes represented in this body not only support terror but threaten other nations and their own people with the most destructive weapons known to humanity.â€ The U.S. has 6,800 nuclear weapons with the capacity to destroy human life on the planet many times over. The U.S. is also the only country who has ever used them.
Trump: â€œNorth Korea’s reckless pursuit of nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles threatens the entire world with unthinkable loss of human life… No nation on Earth has an interest in seeing this band of criminals arm itself with nuclear weapons and missiles.â€ This indeed threatens the entire world, but it applies to every nation pursuing or holding nuclear weapons. No exception. In fact, Trump is making a strong case for the complete abolition of nuclear weapons.
Trump: â€œThe United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea.â€ This is a threat of committing mass atrocities against approximately 25 million people and most certainly killing millions more in South Korea or Japan which would bear the consequences of such a war. A threat that can only be realized by launching a nuclear war. This needs to sink in. U.S. President Donald Trump used his United Nations General Assembly speech to threaten nuclear war against a sovereign country. It is also a direct violation of the UN Charter, which reads that â€œall Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any stateâ€
The notion of having â€œno choiceâ€ other than taking 25 million human lives is the most troubling element of the entire address. No choice? How about starting real negotiations without pre-conditions? How about engaging North Korea on multiple levels of diplomacy (direct and indirect) and initiate citizen-diplomacy to humanize â€œthe otherâ€ 25 million North Koreans. How about moving away from tit-for-tat playground mentality toward problem-solving approaches through recognition and respect, even in an adversarial relationship? How about identifying and referencing other successful difficult diplomatic breakthroughs (hint: Iran Deal)? How about engaging conflict resolution professionals who understand preventing war instead of professionals who understand fighting war? Wouldnâ€™t a self-declared Master-of-the-Deal always be aware of and one the search for choices to prevent a bad outcome?
It is without question that North Koreaâ€™s nuclear ambitions, testing, and rhetoric are troubling and must not go unanswered. It is also clear that the North Korean people are suffering under the Kim Jong Un regime. However, we are witnessing a very dangerous pattern of conflict escalation by two nuclear armed leaders whose legitimate power rests upon their strong-man talk and actions. In this pattern, a move by one must be answered with a stronger countermove by the other. This is unacceptable to Americans, North Koreans and humanity.
The biggest stick on Trumpâ€™s playground must never be used. Leaders and citizens of all countriesÂ â€“ with or without nuclear weapons â€“ need to rise to the occasion to see the real and present danger of these weapons. How fitting that one day after Trumpâ€™s speech, the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons was opened for signature. Citizens, civil society organizations and leaders now need to throw their force behind the treaty. Clearly, Donald Trump was a bully at the wrong playground, sidelined except for his unwelcome destructive potential, while the smart ones take real steps to give us hope that humanity moves in the right direction and avoids nuclear catastrophe.Î¦
Patrick. T. Hiller, Ph.D., syndicated by PeaceVoice, is a Conflict Transformation scholar and professor, who has served on the Governing Council of the International Peace Research Association (2012-2016), is a member of the Peace and Security Funders Group, and is Director of the War Prevention Initiative of the Jubitz Family Foundation.